yeah, but still kill the same amount and with the same ease? James Holmes killed almost more than double in 15 minutes than all the people killed by Richard Ramirez.
Actually he KILLED less (12 as opposed to Ramirez’ 15) but injured a crap ton more (58). But the concept you’re arguing is valid . . . with a gun you can kill fast, you can kill many, and you can do it all from a lengthy distance from your targets. There is certainly a higher level of commitment needed for someone who chooses to stab, strangle, hit, beat, bludgeon, slice, etc.
I was kind of thinking about all this last night when the beginning of “Gangs of New York” came on TV. I was impressed with the old school butcher-style brutality of those old timey battles . . . crowds of men with pitchforks, bats, and hammers, charging into crowds of men with axes, daggers, chains, etc. . . .
I’ve often considered the reality that I could have faced had I chosen to enlist in the military or been theoretically drafted. It’s easy to put myself in such a position (I am NOT at all discounting the sacrifices taken and risks assumed by the men and women in service, by the way). I’m driving a tank, I’m shooting a gun, I’m jumping out of a plane . . . yes, I may get shot or blown to pieces, and marching around in the desert wearing full garb and 100 pounds of gear sucks ass, but the violence and gore, for the most part, is sudden and quick and I will not often be staring into the screaming face of my enemy when I take his life or he attempts to take mine.
Old school battle, though . . . holy crap. That’s another game. There is no denying the reality of it and there is, in my opinion, no putting it into any metaphorical or cosmic sense of psychological detachment.
There’s this amazing connection between warfare, killing, and video games. This is just as much a case of video games being closer to life as it is life being closer to video games.
I’ve heard MANY first hand shooter accounts or warfare accounts that liken the situation to a video game. In fact, as I recall, when Dylan and Eric were shooting up Columbine they even said, “Man, this is just like a video game!” I have NEVER heard a physical hands-on serial killer ever say he thought his actions were like a video game. I have never even heard a mixed martial arts fighter say this.
Anyway . . . I think a gun enables someone to:
- Make a fast, irreversible, and final decision (a decision which may often be regretted).
- Remove oneself emotionally from the equation (I think seeing someone with a voice and a personality standing in front of you is very different than looking at a figure of a humanoid through the cross-hairs of a rifle scope).
Anyway, I don’t really have an agenda here. I just had random thoughts in my head that I felt like puking onto the monitor.
I guess when it comes to gun laws and control, I’m one of the boring generic citizens that fall in the middle. I think people should have the right to have one or a few, but there should be a bunch of regulations and qualifications thereof. I think it is GREAT that someone is required to take classes and get a license to own a gun. We don’t let people willy nilly get driver’s licenses and only address their infractions after the fact, why should a gun be any different? I also think that, like owning a venomous snake or a lion or something, there should be liability emphasized on the ownership of a gun. If you leave your gun on the coffee table and your 4 year old shoots himself in the face, I hope that you are held accountable.