“So, Congressman Daniels, I see you’re voting ‘No’ on the ‘I Believe The Children Are The Future Act’. Do you not think we should teach them well and let them lead the way?”
“The bill costs 600 billion dollars and is a blatant conflict of interest as it was put together by Skechers to make it mandatory for all kids to have ‘regulation’ backpacks. This has nothing to do with education or social welfare. It’s just pork belly nonsense!”
" I see. Well, there you have it, Folks. The Congressman is Anti-Children and wants to destroy the future for them and everyone else."
Whenever I’m going through the “Voter Information Guide” the first thing I always do, before even reading the pro and con statements is look at who is backing each side. 9 times out of 10 that will already tell me everything I need to know (I.e. Who’s getting greased).
“So, Congressman Daniels, I see you’re voting ‘No’ on the ‘I Believe The Children Are The Future Act’. Do you not think we should teach them well and let them lead the way?”
Yeah, I heard about that act. There was a “sunset clause” built into it so that it would expire after a few years, but then the Greatest Love of All act succeeded it and pretty much made all the original bill’s proposals permanent.
And, off topic, but I agree with the comedian who said that adults are our future…those children aren’t gonna, like, still be children 20 years from now, are they?