Shit, I like most of these bands!!!
How can you diss led Zepelin? Jimmy Page fucking invented guitar soundscaping (backwards echo, meshing guitars overdubs into something more complex than the sum of their parts) and making live drums sound like LIVE drums on recordings.
I get sick of Robert Plant’s signature voice, but at least he has some integrity in pursuing diverse musical genres in his solo career.
Any musician–no mater what their tastes–could learn something from listening to their records.
And that band has never cashed-in, like these revivals of acts or 'supergroups" that should just stay retired (Motley Crue, Van Halen, velvet revolver).
I used to think The '70’s produced some truly awful music (Mellow music, folk music, etc.), but it also fostered and gave birth to a lot things that influenced '80’s/'90’s bands to go in a creative direction.
I certainly don’t see that now–especially when it is much easier to DIY with the electronic availlable. Back then they didn’t have all that, and it took actual human skilland talent to make sounds that were interesting. Today anyone with a computerand a simple sequencing/sampling program can churn something out, cheaply.
It seems now that a band has to have enough appeal to attract respectable concert sales to stay alive, while back then,it was more important to work on the actual music (the LP’s)–which either stood on their own or fell flat on its face due to its content.
Now, you can be a “performance” artist (I’ll bring up a really bad example–brittney spears), and not have a shred of musical talent; but if you put on a good show and have a great producer and junk-food/tabloid public image, you get recognized.
There is no big deal these days about securing a record contract. You can sell your own CD’s and eliminate the middle man.
I guess I’m going off in a tangent, but some of those acts actually did something musically meaningful.