somebody needs to beat the shit outa Limbaugh

what the hell is this ashole’s problem? I mean he generally is an ass but since Obama got elected he has lost whatever sliver of mind he had left!!

Limbaugh has actually come out and said he wants Obama to fail!! isn’t that ANTI-AMERICAN? at least that has been what he said to people who were critical of W.

Limbaugh: I’m happy to be the last man standing. I’m honored to be the last man standing. Yeah, I’m the true maverick. I can do more than four words. I could say I hope he fails and I could do a brief explanation of why. You know, I want to win. If my party doesn’t, I do. If my party has sacrificed the whole concept of victory, sorry, I’m now the Republican in name only, and they are the sellouts.

I’m serious about this. Why in the world, it’s what Ann Coulter was talking about, the tyranny of the majority, all these victims here, we gotta make sure the victims are finally assuaged. Well, the dirty little secret is this isn’t going to assuage anybody’s victim status, and the race industry isn’t going to go away, and the fact that America’s original sin of slavery is going to be absolved, it’s not going to happen. Just isn’t, folks. It’s too big a business for the left to keep all those things alive that divide the people of this country into groups that are against each other. Yes, I’m fired up about this.

If his brand of politics were great then the repubs wouldv’e never lost power, 73,000 retailers nation wide wouldn’t be filing for bankruptcy, unemployment wouldn’t be nearing double digits (although I’m sure it’s beyond double digits at this point since you are no longer counted as unemployed after 2 years regardless if you have found a job or not). fat piece of shit! I wish i could run into some these fuckers like hannity on the street!!![mad]
Late,
grmpysmrf

Grmpy, people like Limbaugh, Coulter, Hannity and O’reilly will always be out there on their soapboxes as long as there is a crowd of idiots who will listen and pay money for their sort of drivel… and unfortunately in this country there is no shortage of morons to go around.

This is not to diss all conservatives, as there are many, many practical, smart conservatives that are ashamed by mass-media morons such as these.

But just tune in to Keith Olberman’s “worst person in the world” segment on “Countdown” and you will hear idiocy of this magnitude or higher on a daily basis! Fortunately, much of the public has finally figured out the NeoCons are assholes and is responding as such in terms of the cable news market and so forth… Let us hope they are but a footnote in history.

I saw an interview with Ann Coulter a couple of weeks ago.
I was waiting for the people in white coats and the show’s security staff to cart her off the set.

For entertainment purposes, it’s the first video in this link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/05/ann-coulters-today-show-a_n_155393.html

yes to everything you said ( i watch keith religously) it’s just that i would like some instant gratification from the pain of these losers at least once.
Late,
grmpysmrf

I agree that Rush is a fat piece of shit and his propaganda hurts America…but, he’s right about people on the left wanting Bush to fail from day 1. It’s the American way: believe your party is right no matter what, believe the other party is wrong, no matter what. It really should be different now b/c of the economic climate, but it’s not. Obama will hopefully bring change, but people never will.

I hope I don’t sound like a broken record on here, but I believe people have gotten far away from having their own ideas, ethics, and beliefs and simply lose themselves in their party affiliation. If W. would have done a good job as president (laughable, I know), the left would have still hated him, pointed out his flaws, and demonized him. However, he did all that to himself so there was no need. If Obama does a fantastic job, there will still be tons of assholes on the right that will never admit it and continue to hate him, b/c of his policies, party affiliation or race.

I’m not talking about anyone on this forum, especially you grumpy, since you’re a teacher, I fully understand why you’re 100% dem. However, I try to force myself to watch, listen to and read propaganda on both sides to see how the both spin things and point fingers at the other, while little gets done except misuse of tax dollars and politicians getting caught selling senate seats, smoking crack, buying whores… It’s getting worse, and will continue to until something changes in Washington or in the system as a whole. I think Obama is going to be a good, perhaps great president. But I really don’t have enough faith that there will be real change made in Washington.

I agree that Rush is a fat piece of shit and his propaganda hurts America…but, he’s right about people on the left wanting Bush to fail from day 1. It’s the American way: believe your party is right no matter what, believe the other party is wrong, no matter what.

People on the Left didn’t want Bush to fail. They KNEW he would fail. There’s a difference. From '93-'01 we had peace and prosperity…but Bush and the Neocons got away from the policies that brought us those things. Bush had been my governor in TX and I knew what a fuck-up he was…it was a no brainer that he’d be a failure as President. Just like his Daddy, and Reagan, and Nixon before him.

And I disagree that Americans blindly follow their party affiliation. Some do, and generally those people are Republicans. Democrats, not so much. As Will Rogers once said, “I’m not a member of any organized party…I’m a Democrat”.

From '93-'01 we had peace and prosperity…

Veterans of Somalia and Bosnia might disagree with you on that.

[reply]From '93-'01 we had peace and prosperity…

Veterans of Somalia and Bosnia might disagree with you on that.[/reply]

ZERO (0) US casualties in Bosnia…and a sound exit strategy. UN sanctioned as well.

In Somalia…18 US casualties. US troops were introduced to Somalia during Bush I. Clinton was just cleaning up the mess.

Neither one is even slightly comparable to the mess that Bush II started in Iraq.

People on the Left didn’t want Bush to fail. They KNEW he would fail. There’s a difference. From '93-'01 we had peace and prosperity…but Bush and the Neocons got away from the policies that brought us those things. Bush had been my governor in TX and I knew what a fuck-up he was…it was a no brainer that he’d be a failure as President. Just like his Daddy, and Reagan, and Nixon before him.

There was peace and prosperity? Maybe the latter. In '93, the first WTC bombing killed 6 people. In '98, the bombing of 2 U.S. embassies in Africa killed 224. Bin Laden was doing as he pleased, while Bill was getting his dick sucked. Just like everyone talks about the “Bin Laden determined to strike within the US” memo that is egg on the face of W., Bill Clinton’s administration had more than enough time and intelligence to take care of that situation. Perhaps if they had, we’d never have had a 9/11 and never have had any justification to go to war in ANY country. If business would have been taken care of when it needed to be, America might be at peace right now. Most level headed democrats would agree that the Clinton administration really dropped the ball in that dept.

And I disagree that Americans blindly follow their party affiliation. Some do, and generally those people are Republicans. Democrats, not so much.

I think you just proved my point. I’m pretty sure repubs would say the exact opposite and think they were telling the truth.

Don’t take anything in most as personal, b/c it’s hard to talk(type?) politics w/out coming off as arrogant or mean. I just think you’re of the exact mindset that I write of. By no means am I inferring that you are not intelligent, just of this party mindset that I feel is doing more to corrode America than any one party can do on their own. Prove me wrong. Tell me where you differ from democratic policy. Acknowledge mistakes democrats have made historically or recently. I can think of several right off the top of my head. People of party mindset pick and choose what they want to acknowledge and make a talking point, just like christians pick and choose what part of the bible to quote to support their predetermined views.

Maybe I’m jaded, but just think there’s way more broken with our government than can be fixed by simply replacing members of one party with members of the other.

[reply][reply]From '93-'01 we had peace and prosperity…

Veterans of Somalia and Bosnia might disagree with you on that.[/reply]

ZERO (0) US casualties in Bosnia…and a sound exit strategy. UN sanctioned as well.

In Somalia…18 US casualties. US troops were introduced to Somalia during Bush I. Clinton was just cleaning up the mess.

Neither one is even slightly comparable to the mess that Bush II started in Iraq.[/reply]
I’ll second that!

Just like everyone talks about the “Bin Laden determined to strike within the US” memo that is egg on the face of W., Bill Clinton’s administration had more than enough time and intelligence to take care of that situation.

I can’t back this because it’s a repub talking point! Who knows if the Clinton admin really had time or intell to deal with it? nobody ever heard this until W needed an excuse for nor reacting to the bin laden memo. I refuse to believe that any person would sell out our country for no reason? For what end would that accomplish for Clinton push that off on Bush? so clinton just sat in office for 8 years saying, “just bide my time play a little defense and leave it to the repub pres that is going to cheat his way into the white house” If Clinton really left that mess then it would’ve fucked Gore had he won(which i’m sure he was betting on Gore to win) and ultimately fucked his own party and goes directly against your own theory of party group think. (don’t mean to be snarky but as you pointed out it’s hard to write politics with the proper tone)

Most level headed democrats would agree that the Clinton administration really dropped the ball in that dept.

I don’t think so for the reasons I’ve already outlined.

[reply]And I disagree that Americans blindly follow their party affiliation. Some do, and generally those people are Republicans. Democrats, not so much.

I think you just proved my point. I’m pretty sure repubs would say the exact opposite and think they were telling the truth.

Don’t take anything in most as personal, b/c it’s hard to talk(type?) politics w/out coming off as arrogant or mean. I just think you’re of the exact mindset that I write of. By no means am I inferring that you are not intelligent, just of this party mindset that I feel is doing more to corrode America than any one party can do on their own. [/reply]

That’s not proving your point. Repubs are far more lockstep than dems. I’m sure you could prove this. (Important repubs any way). Pick a news outlet and choose your repub and the story/talking points will all be the same from any other repub on any other news outlet! repubs NEVER openly disagree. Dems openly bicker.

Prove me wrong. Tell me where you differ from democratic policy. Acknowledge mistakes democrats have made historically or recently. I can think of several right off the top of my head. People of party mindset pick and choose what they want to acknowledge and make a talking point, just like christians pick and choose what part of the bible to quote to support their predetermined views.

see, you could never get a repub to say what they disagree with, the best you’ll get is a vague “I don’t agree with everything they do” but I’ll be damned if they will give you any specifics.

I can’t stand “affirmative action” a majorly supported Dem topic, to me A.A. is racist. No difference between picking a person to be a criminal because of the color of their skin or picking them for a job. rewards or punishments if the only criteria is race that is racist.

I tend to vote democrat because they generally are the closest to my values than any other party. If the Repubs want to start championing civil liberties, cut their ties to overtly destructive racist organizations and individuals (KKK doesn’t vote left, ever nor have the dems accidently endorsed a grand dragon to run on their ticket!) and stop putting the almighty dollar over real people I’d more than love to switch parties. I tend to vote democrat not because I’ve associated myself with that party but they seem to lean closer to the values i support.
In closing I would like to say that i find it humorous in such a way that i live in bizzaro world that the republicans are the party of Christ, especially when Christ was the biggest liberal hippy ever! Jesus never asked for insurance when he cured the lepers or sent the masses a bill after he turned water into wine and fed the hungry!
Late,
grmpysmrf

king smrf, rather cogent points as usual. limbaugh looks and sweats like he’s usin’–AGAIN. probably wants obama to fail so he’ll stay in business.
listening to all the commentary on fox and elsewhere after the inauguration, i was waiting for one of those idiots to slip in “nigger’.
limbaugh and crew, skirted and otherwise, are at a loss to find anything wrong with obama, so they hyperventilate over nothing and the impression that leaves (for me) is that they’re trying SO hard to create fear of the black man because, you know,” they all be bad". damn darkies. limbaugh may be exhibiting his inferiority complex when it comes to black men, and coulter’s unhappy she can’t get one. who knows.

sick.

I can’t back this because it’s a repub talking point! Who knows if the Clinton admin really had time or intell to deal with it?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4540958/
I’m pretty sure msnbc isn’t fox news.

nobody ever heard this until W needed an excuse for nor reacting to the bin laden memo.

It would have never been a talking point on either side, but 9/11 happened so it has become one.

I refuse to believe that any person would sell out our country for no reason? For what end would that accomplish for Clinton push that off on Bush? so clinton just sat in office for 8 years saying, “just bide my time play a little defense and leave it to the repub pres that is going to cheat his way into the white house” If Clinton really left that mess then it would’ve fucked Gore had he won(which i’m sure he was betting on Gore to win) and ultimately fucked his own party and goes directly against your own theory of party group think. (don’t mean to be snarky but as you pointed out it’s hard to write politics with the proper tone)

I agree. I don’t think Clinton planned anything. He just failed to take action when action could have prevented. His mind was on getting ass and having to lie about it.

[reply] Most level headed democrats would agree that the Clinton administration really dropped the ball in that dept.

I don’t think so for the reasons I’ve already outlined[/reply]

See the above link.

If the Repubs want to start championing civil liberties, cut their ties to overtly destructive racist organizations and individuals (KKK doesn’t vote left, ever nor have the dems accidently endorsed a grand dragon to run on their ticket!)

Ever heard of Robert Byrd? Senior democratic Senator of West Virginia? The longest serving member in the Senate history and former leader of the democratic party? Former member of the KKK? He is quoted “I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side… Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

and stop putting the almighty dollar over real people

Agreed.

Jesus never asked for insurance when he cured the lepers or sent the masses a bill after he turned water into wine and fed the hungry!

I laugh at this hypocrisy as well. All republicans care about morally is forcing their favorite parts of the bible on people who don’t want to listen and make life hard for gays and pregnant women facing one of the toughest decisions they’ll ever have to make.

[reply]I can’t back this because it’s a repub talking point! Who knows if the Clinton admin really had time or intell to deal with it?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4540958/
I’m pretty sure msnbc isn’t fox news.[/reply]

fair enough

[reply]nobody ever heard this until W needed an excuse for nor reacting to the bin laden memo.

It would have never been a talking point on either side, but 9/11 happened so it has become one.[/reply]

I refuse to believe that any person would sell out our country for no reason? For what end would that accomplish for Clinton push that off on Bush? so clinton just sat in office for 8 years saying, “just bide my time play a little defense and leave it to the repub pres that is going to cheat his way into the white house” If Clinton really left that mess then it would’ve fucked Gore had he won(which i’m sure he was betting on Gore to win) and ultimately fucked his own party and goes directly against your own theory of party group think. (don’t mean to be snarky but as you pointed out it’s hard to write politics with the proper tone)

I agree. I don’t think Clinton planned anything. He just failed to take action when action could have prevented. His mind was on getting ass and having to lie about it.[/reply]

I think that may be an overly simplistic attitude towards Clinton… if you read the rest of that article it also says:

"In reality, getting bin Laden would have been extraordinarily difficult. He was a moving target deep inside Afghanistan. Most military operations would have been high-risk.

they disrupted terrorist cells and made al-Qaida a top national security priority.

“We used military force, we used covert operations, we used all of the tools available to us because we realized what a serious threat this was,” said President Clinton’s former national security adviser James Steinberg."

Even worse after military action had been taken with bush when Bush gutted our constitution with the patriot act he is guilty of the same shit he is accusing clinton of because Bush let Bin Laden get away at tora bora and that was after Laden slapped the dog shit outta us on 9/11. so again the blame still falls at the feet of W.
Not only that if that Bush was so good at “keeping us safe” he would’ve been all over that memo before it even it showed as a briefing… you feel me dawg??

[reply] Most level headed democrats would agree that the Clinton administration really dropped the ball in that dept.

I don’t think so for the reasons I’ve already outlined[/reply]

See the above link.

If the Repubs want to start championing civil liberties, cut their ties to overtly destructive racist organizations and individuals (KKK doesn’t vote left, ever nor have the dems accidently endorsed a grand dragon to run on their ticket!)

Ever heard of Robert Byrd? Senior democratic Senator of West Virginia? The longest serving member in the Senate history and former leader of the democratic party? Former member of the KKK? He is quoted “I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side… Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”[/reply]

I don’t see this as making excuses although some may say differently but that qoute is well over 60 years old and he has to have had a change of ideals cause other wise he wouldn’t be a democratic senator. Not only that but from wikipedia:

“In 1997, he told an interviewer he would encourage young people to become involved in politics, but to "Be sure you avoid the Ku Klux Klan. Don’t get that albatross around your neck. Once you’ve made that mistake, you inhibit your operations in the political arena.”[10] In his latest autobiography, Byrd explained that he was a member because he "was sorely afflicted with tunnel vision — a jejune and immature outlook— seeing only what I wanted to see because I thought the Klan could provide an outlet for my talents and ambitions."[11] Byrd also said, in 2005,

I know now I was wrong. Intolerance had no place in America. I apologized a thousand times… and I don’t mind apologizing over and over again. I can’t erase what happened."

for me that’s enough to believe he’s turned over a new leaf. so he doesn’t really bring down the dems or openly associate with racialy destructive organizations.
david duke said the same kinda shit in '91 but then as soon as he was exposed he went right back to the kkk and the became a repub representitive for (I think)mississippi and continues to issue a doctrine of hate… disgusting.
Late,
grmpysmrf

king smrf, rather cogent points as usual.

thank you good sir. Glad to see you’re back I hope you come around with the frequency that you did before the election.

limbaugh looks and sweats like he’s usin’–AGAIN.

Not with all of that weight he’s put back on! The cotton made him thin and by the looks of him I’d say he was back at about 250lbs.

probably wants obama to fail so he’ll stay in business.

Good guess

listening to all the commentary on fox and elsewhere after the inauguration, i was waiting for one of those idiots to slip in "nigger’.

I love how when dems were trying to stand up against W when he was destroying our rights Dems were called “anti-american” and “now is not the time for dissent” and now that repubs are in that same leaky boat that the dems were in the only thing they can say is “Dissent is the most patriotic thing any American can do!”

limbaugh and crew, skirted and otherwise, are at a loss to find anything wrong with obama, so they hyperventilate over nothing and the impression that leaves (for me) is that they’re trying SO hard to create fear of the black man because, you know," they all be bad".

well Fear has been quite the profitable business the last 8 years! you can’t blame them for trying to sell any brand

damn darkies. limbaugh may be exhibiting his inferiority complex when it comes to black men, and coulter’s unhappy she can’t get one. who knows.
sick.

No way dude! Coulter IS a man! check out the adams apple on that chick!! It’s bigger than mine!! Pretending is fine but for coulter to get a man would make her gay and that’s just gay!!
Late,
grmpysmrf

I have no time for partisan politics. The squabbles between governments and their oppositions are often so petty and pathetic that one would wish for anarchy (which I’m not a fan of). And yet its the partisan game that rules most countries. The worst is when you see young people going into politics full of ideals then see them slowly morph into just another party member. Its a chronic debilitating disease. It happened somewhat to a good friend of mine. When starting college a few years ago he was brimming with energy and ideals. He was very much on the left. But then he chose to join the biggest party here (because his family have always voted that way) and within 2-3 years he was very much in the party mold when it came to political issues. His idiosyncrasy and passion just whittled away. He’s still a good friend and is sound in almost every other regard but it is shameful what happened. What one has to do to get ahead in politics.

“Why of course the people don’t want war. Why should some poor slob on
a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of
it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people
don’t want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in
Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the
country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to
drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist
dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no
voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

  • Hermann Goering [Göring], (1893-1946); Commander of the Luftwaffe and 2nd in command to Hitler: “Nuremberg Diary” by Gustave Gilbert, 18 April 1946.

Even worse after military action had been taken with bush when Bush gutted our constitution with the patriot act he is guilty of the same shit he is accusing clinton of because Bush let Bin Laden get away at tora bora and that was after Laden slapped the dog shit outta us on 9/11. so again the blame still falls at the feet of W.
Not only that if that Bush was so good at “keeping us safe” he would’ve been all over that memo before it even it showed as a briefing… you feel me dawg??

100%. I’m simply playing devil’s advocate and pointing out that to say that the world was a peaceful oasis during the Clinton years is irresponsible. Terror was brewing.

With every issue I try to see both sides and then another. To be a total nerd and quote Star Wars: “Only a Sith deals in absolutes”. With the 2 party system, things can only be black and white when there is more gray in this world than either of the other. More and more everything is about the far left and far right, radical ideals and no common sense. I’ve seen a lot lately where politicians are voting against what Americans want, including W. and our democratic house and senate of the last 2 years.

I think Bill Clinton was a good president. He was a very centrist democrat which is what our country needs more of. It’s silly to think there weren’t things done wrong with that administration, though.

As far as Byrd goes, I’m sure he has probably changed, but once again, devil’s advocate. I live in Oklahoma, so I’m used to arguing with republicans and not the other way around. My dad calls me a liberal and I can’t convince him otherwise, even though I’m far from it in many ways. On most issues, the democratic party is the more compassionate party, but quite often they are so to a fault. It’s easy to let ideals get in the way of responsible politics.

I think Bill Clinton was a good president… It’s silly to think there weren’t things done wrong with that administration, though.

Absolutely, I think you could put NAFTA and GATT at the top of the list!
Nothing wrong with devil’s advocate I play the advocate all the time… you can’t make an informed decision if you haven’t got all of the information and irks me when people talk shit after getting talking points from someone who has get them second hand. I feel justified in talking shit about hannity O’rielly or limbaugh because i will watch/listen to their programs every so often. Which is more than the Michael moore haters will do. I hate when people talk shit about anybody with out actually listening to them. My buddy hates Mike Moore but then he has not EVER watched a Mike Doc. so I made him watch SICKO. And the opinion changed, “Oh he wasn’t what I thought he was going to be at all!”
Well that’s what happens when you see for yourself rather than listening to other fucking people!
Late,
grmpysmrf

Also, to throw in my two cents, I think that in the case of these republican/democratic radio personalities , they have this thing where they develop an ego complex (hello o’reilley) and want to be 100% right all the time. So when a politician they did not support gets in, they want that person to fail just to be able to say “I told you so”.