There should be no style limitations.
Hard industrial or crooning like Bing Crosby, a wide range of styles will simply reflect the diversity of prongs.org.
I totally agree with rev-skarekroe on this… but we’d want some continuity on the disc. Perhaps, whoever is arranging the tracks, start off light, finish heavy… or sort of guitar based songs first, then industral sort of guitar songs, then the outright electronic stuff. There’s gotta be some sort of consistency.
I’d rather it be Ministry covers/“interpretations” if anything, because it would be much more of a challenge, especially for the noise/drone dudes.
I think the general consensus so far is not to do Ministry cover songs. If we went that route it would put us into a gray area legally, and the last thing I want is for certain people to have a reason to harass Afra.
This is so sad, but true. A risk we can’t really take. I have a few great ministry covers past piss army members contributed (like that buddard chap), but given the litigious path angie j’s been treading of late, it may be too much of a risk.
Then there’s the problem of copyright clearance, royalties…
I mean, that really comes into it depending on how professionally we wanna release it. If it was just a downloadable free digipack on the net, it might not be so bad…
Will this compilation be the best thing ever released to human ears? Will it be conceptually complex? Will it be a chart buster? No to all, but it could be a really cool document of this strange and bewildering beast we call Prongs! Sure, it could include Ministry covers for those who want to do that (just like Prongs includes threads about Ministry) but it could include lots of random oddness too, which is cool.
[quote]I definitely agree to this, which is why I think perhaps we should just leave this as a downloadable digital copy on the net with artwork attached and what not.
If we get it printed and whatever, we’ve gotta pay printing and formatting costs; not fun. Then we’ve gotta pay a distro, some arsehole who gets 90% of the money just for shipping it out to wherever. Nup. Rather would keep it a non-profit free for all.
Another thing to consider is mastering;
the last thing we want is a compilation where all the song levels are uneven. If anyone’s got access to protools, maybe dump each song as one track and just compress the level’s til they’re even. Primitive, but cheap and effective. It all depends on how much effort and time we want to put into this, but I believe the mastering is essential.
Also, I don’t think anyone should be able to contribute more than one song per-project. One each is enough.