London Bombings / American Media

Okay, I had to delurk after reading this crap. You, grmpysmrf, are without a doubt, THE biggest retard I have run into online. And I’ve trolled Radiohead forums in the past.

My word!! A like-minded soul! There’s hope for the future yet. And I’ll bet he’s a NIN hater to boot.

(It should be noted however, that grumpy is FAR from being the biggest ‘retard’ on this forum.)

Yeah, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler really were shining examples of right wing conservatives, weren’t they? Last time I checked, communism and Naziism (aka national socialism) were left wing ideologies.

If ya say so, Chuckles. Yr comments on this matter are a little confusing at best.
(scratches head)

'Bout time you stopped looking to Michael Moore for your opinion on all things political, no?

Save yr breath. 'Cos it ain’t gonna happen anytime soon on this forum.

I would simply pose the question to the sheep on this forum: How much cash do you think Moore and Jourgenson and their ilk have raked in on their quest to convince the world of the evils of the family Bush?

That’s only 'cuz leftists don’t have the initiative to form their own companies in the first place.

Conservative governments take action. Leftist governments discuss in committees.

Left people are not greedy

Definitely the stupidest thing I’ve heard on this forum, Mr Smurf.

Once again I ask: how much money has Mr Moore made from his social do-goodings.

And I’ll bet ya a gram of coke he doesn’t still live in the Michigan suburb he grew up in and now so loudly applauds.

What the hell? This is all over the place. Keep your political arguments to at least two topics or less. National Socialism left wing? What the fuck, dude? Thats apples and oranges. Anything condemming Marxism as the plot of an evil race isn’t too liberal, at least in my mind. I think we all can agree that Joseph Stalin wasn’t exactly loyal to the doctrines he had once framed. Not do so much to which wing of the hall he sat on idealogically, but more so do to him being a power hungry militantly inhumane bastard. Inhumanity does not hold places in politics, that has more to do with the mental state of the individual and the politics they spin around such a devoid state of reason. The fact is, everyone’s evil. We got assholes on the left. And we got assholes on the right. If this last election didn’t show you that, you got to pay more attention. No side is given divine right (excuse the pun) and no side is wholy condemned. Mainly it comes down to who and how much you want taken out of your paycheck. Wars are fought in a system outside political divisions. This is the main lesson I took away from the last few years. Wars are fought on principles of morals and needs hopefully. When politics skew those things, thats when shit gets unneedily fuzzy. What was my point? Ah fuck it, I’m tired and just off work. Goodnight.

reply]

yeah we need more righties. right wingers are always the ones to follow here’s a short list of excellent NON LEFTIST leaders

Gov. George Wallace
Joseph Stalin
Charles Keating (leader of S&L)
Pol Pot
David Duke
Adolf Hitler (you knew he was coming)
Rush Limbaugh
KKK
Phyliss Schlaffley (women against Womens rights leader)

Okay, I had to delurk after reading this crap. You, grmpysmrf, are without a doubt, THE biggest retard I have run into online. And I’ve trolled Radiohead forums in the past.

And your credentials are Radiohead forum lurker? Shit, I’m sorry I didn’t know I was dealing with a professional here. I can already tell you are RIGHT because your post had no depth just ad hominems, the first line of defense from the brain dead RIGHT.

Yeah, Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler really were shining examples of right wing conservatives, weren’t they? Last time I checked, communism and Naziism (aka national socialism) were left wing ideologies. That’s left as in the opposite of right, by the way. )

LOL you picked the two that are THE MOST EXTREME RIGHT and said nothing of the other. You didn’t even try to duck the KKK, impressive or just stupid!

I’m talking them being RIGHT in actions and deeds not LABELS. The Right is NOT TOLERANT OF OTHERS AT ALL (JUST LIKE YOURSELF- you went into a grade school tirade at my observations complete with the Republican “go to play” when you are at a loss, the AD HOMINEM congratulations you have been trained well you prol.) Yeah, sure, they are labeled LEFT but if you have the brain that you think you do in your head, that list being a group of “leftists” is about as laughable as Rush Limbuagh being a tolerant up standing citizen. Perhaps you should stop letting O’reily and Limbaugh tell you how to think, No?

If your pea-sized intellect can’t cope with such a gargantuan concept, hold out both your arms and look each way several times. 'Bout time you stopped looking to Michael Moore for your opinion on all things political, no?

LOL, what gargantuan concept would that be? Is this another exercise in specious reasoning or a non-sequitor. Let me know.

you know a list of people you really want to look up to. NONE OF THESE PEOPLE ARE LEFT THEY ARE ALL CONSERVATIVE AND HAVE DONE MAJOR DAMAGE TO SOCIETIES.

Well… you got that last part sorta right. Sorta.

Surprised you’re not supporting them, they are all conservative. You know, I wouldn’t want to be associated with David Duke, a noted Republican and GRAND WIZARD in the KKK. I wouldn’t want to be associated with Governor Wallace AN ADMITTED RACIST. The party of non tolerance is not my party! I guess maybe you can soothe yourself by thinking Wallace is better cause he didn’t come out against Jews the way Hitler did but they both agree on colored folks as well as gay people, shit 2/3 ain’t bad for a guy that is supposed to be a leftist (Hitler) Or does that make Wallace a leftist too and he’s just confused about being a right winger? Labels don’t always match actions, think about that or ask Rush about it and get back to me!

IF it wasn’t for that dirty Word(liberals) black folks wouldn’t be voting. Women would only be able to dream of a glass ceiling instead of slamming into it! Liberals are responsible for all of the social progress in this country. The right has seemed to convince over half the voting population that left is bad, even though the left has fought to preserve all of our freedoms.

Ahhh… the enlightened progressive throwing a hissy fit because certain people have the gall to see things differently. Do continue, it’s most amusing. Pussy.

Wonderful vocabulary, I hadn’t attacked anyone with ad hominems you on the other hand… you said something about seeing things differently, at least I was not abusive. You have said nothing against my argument but instead, again, presented an ad Hominem Congratulations, Prol. Ann Coultier would be pleased!

If the left is so bad how come you Leftists never steal retirement money from people to they make their already own large bank account even larger. People of the left also don’t lay off 25,000 employees so their stock can go up a quarter of a point.

That’s only 'cuz leftists don’t have the initiative to form their own companies in the first place. Besides, what’s wrong with laying off workers anyway? If you can successfully explain this, I’ll give ya a cookie!

How funny, again you support my argument by saying greed is important. Aside from that, it sounds to me like you are saying the left is lazy. However, I’m sure your writing on this is vague on purpose, this way you can successfully back track. Until you explain yourself I will leave off my list of non lazy leftist most notably the thorn in your ad hominem attacking side, Michael Moore

You obviously have not had basic economics if you need to know why laying off the work force is bad. Aside from sky rocketing the unemployment/poverty rates as well as widening our society into a 3rd world RICH/POOR only society I guess nothing is wrong. It’s funny the way REPUBLICANS had this exceptional foresight that social security was going to collapse. IF you have 35,000 people laid off –sure to be more thanks to our conservative friends-(courtesy of HP & GM) that’s 35,000 people not paying into social security. So I would have to say that Most Firing companies had already had wind Of CAFTA and decided to do something “ALTRUISTIC” for social security.

Left people are not greedy and It would seem the right embraces greed as one of their family values
Late,
grmpysmrf

A certain amount of self-serving greed is utterly vital for the well-being of society.

Greed and a need to improve ones station is life are not the same and you seem to think It is, poor you. Stealing billions of dollars from the elderly/poor/destitute is not a vital component for society.

This is common knowledge to anyone who doesn’t have their head well and firmly up their ass.

The smell must be atrocious for you then

Oh, and at least the right has family values. You never read the Communist
Manifesto, numb-nuts?

What would those family values be? Drug Use/thievery/Greed/Hatred? Fuck you, you can have those family values I don’t want them. KEEP them within your little clique and stop fucking with the law to make yourself feel better about them.

Oh, and to everyone with more than two braincells who posts here, greetings!

That means who ever agrees with him, even though he supports diversity LOL!
Don’t bother responding because you will touch none of my arguments just like the first time you responded. Maybe you can come up with some new names to call me ‘cause you can’t touch my arguments.
Late,
grmpysmrf

Afra, I’ve noticed that when you have witnessed some sensationalism from U.S. Press it’s always from a source like CNN. To be blunt, no one watches CNN anymore; therefore, CNN has to resort to that sort of journalism (i.e., "Who’s Going To DIE next?) to try to get viewers.

Fox News has higher ratings than all cable news services combined. But then I have a beef with them, as well, because it’s the “Natalie Halloway” poor-excuse-of-story which gets reported ad nauseum to the exclusion of other newsworthy stories because it’s a ratings winner. I am so sick of watching news and hearing about missing people–especially when there’s nothing of substance to say.

Also, as the LA Times reported in last Sunday’s paper, there’s a fixation with celebrities and tabloid journalism that supposedly hard-news sources are now featuring as prime material. It’s a vicious cycle where news is turning into what’s NOW and immediate–who’s fucking whom, Tom Cruise’s psycho-babble, Lindsey Lohan’s anorexia–and the media need new celebrities to fill up pages or bloggers because that’s what people want. One of the fastest-growing segments of most visited blogs is LA tabloid trash site that prides itself in throwing out any story older than an hour (defamer–part of even larger conglomeration of news-turned-trash sites). The internet is where more people are getting their news. But it’s not issue-oriented, thought provoking news.

People may say they’re interested in such things as the london bombings, but when they’re in their cubicle at work, they’re reading the latest celebrity fascination gossip.