TMIATTTT in Decibel's November Issue

chris was referring to paul and bill, and had that “journalist” actually made it clear that paul, bill and chris were being interviewed separately from the cuban, that would have set some perspective.the three of them agreed to an interview sans the cuban.

I haven’t seen the article, but this clipping (again, just taken from the posts above) makes it seem pretty obvious to me that ONLY Paul, Bill, and Chris were physically with the interviewer.

“It took us a while to get industrial pioneers Ministry in the Decibel Hall of Fame — classic case of the classic lineup hating each other’s classic guts. But enterprising staffer Chris Dick finally convinced the infamous “Book Club” (Paul Barker, Bill Rieflin, Chris Connelly) to sit down together…”

does a “phoner” not resonate. really.

does a “phoner” not resonate. really.

What?

ARGUING!

James, I’m peculiar also. Oh poor little rebellious brat got his foot stepped on. Call a toe truck and forget Jesus.

chris would never say that because it’s not true. and he and Paul and Bill talk regularly.find a different hobby would you please, hm?

Chris would never say "Of course that’s nonsense, these guys are like brothers to me! we actually did the interview together and it was really good fun " because it’s not true?

If you’re going to silliness at least make sure it’s not silliness that’s easily contraindicated in the very same thread.

Read the interview today, very long and extensive, very fun read. I didn’t get the impression the journalist mislead readers into believing everyone was interviewed at the same time.

I was surprised at the Paul and CC bashing on Al’s part, came off bitter and defensive and this may be the worst I’ve seen in
print yet. Bill came off very objective when talking about the workflow and who did what. I tend to believe his version.

I was surprised at the Paul and CC bashing on Al’s part, came off bitter and defensive and this may be the worst I’ve seen in
print yet. Bill came off very objective when talking about the workflow and who did what. I tend to believe his version.

Did Al have any new insults or were they just rehashed? Sounds like this article is a must for Ministry enthusiasts.

when you purport to write something related to an interview, make it clear who is at the table and who isn’t.again, paul, bill and chris agreed to this interview with the caveat that al was not a participant.they also knew that he would be interviewed separately. that does not give this “journalist” license to create fiction.they were not in the same room, same time frame, zero…i pondered getting back to this board after speaking with ogre or maybe not. some here are smarter than me. in the spirit of this interview, concoct your own story.

dick - nothing new: he was just he bass player, he ran the business, and it did badly under him. I did my best albums after he left… blah blah…

oh “al”. did you forget that you shouldn’t say slanderous/libelous things about your ex partner in crime? hm?

when you purport to write something related to an interview, make it clear who is at the table and who isn’t.again, paul, bill and chris agreed to this interview with the caveat that al was not a participant.they also knew that he would be interviewed separately. that does not give this “journalist” license to create fiction.they were not in the same room, same time frame, zero…i pondered getting back to this board after speaking with ogre or maybe not. some here are smarter than me. in the spirit of this interview, concoct your own story.

Other than you, no one else is confused or felt “misled” by the interview.

All you can think about is for me to look the other direction so I can hear you cry about some old slop. Even Mormon’s eat sloppy Joe’s.

It’s a great article. It’s perfectly clear Al (and Ogre) are not in the same doom as the others. Sober Al is very lucid but also a total dickhead.

when you purport to write something related to an interview, make it clear who is at the table and who isn’t.

[red] When you purport to write something related to an interview, make it clear who is at the table and who isn’t. [/red] Well done! The only thing you missed was a capital letter at the beginning of the sentence. Proper comma use, however, makes Poppa proud!

again, paul, bill and chris agreed to this interview with the caveat that al was not a participant.they also knew that he would be interviewed separately.

[red]Paul, Bill, and Chris agreed to this interview with the understanding that Al was not a participant for this specific interview. They did know that Al would be interviewed on a different occasion. [/red] First, you misused the term “caveat.” Dictionary.com defines caveat as being a “warning or caution; admonition.” Furthermore, you contradict yourself. You say they agreed to the interview under the assumption that Al would not participate, only to say that Al would be interviewed. Also, proper nouns need to be capitalized.

that does not give this “journalist” license to create fiction.

[red] Unfortunately, the journalist mislead his readers with the situation. [/red] I have not seen the interview, so I’m not sure how accurate this is. However, I’m pretty sure the questions and answers that were published were indeed the questions and answers given. Fiction means that it isn’t true. Was there any place specifically in the article where the journalist says all of the members were together at the table?

they were not in the same room, same time frame, zero…

[red] The men were not in the same room at the same time. [/red] I’m actually getting tired of pointing out every error. This is quite the task I decided to take on.

i pondered getting back to this board after speaking with ogre or maybe not. some here are smarter than me.

[red] I pondered posting on this board again after I spoke with Ogre. Many on this board are more intelligent than I am, including Lunatic_Genius. [/red] First person pronoun is capitalized. Leave out unnecessary phrases, and while I’m sure you were using verbal irony (sarcasm), I took it upon myself to point out that I am smarter than you.

in the spirit of this interview, concoct your own story.

[red] Because I feel as if the interview was not very well-written, concoct your own story. As always, I sure as hell will not clarify anything or answer any of your direct questions, so you are on your own. [/red] Funny that someone will critique a journalist for not being direct given the circumstances. People in glass houses and all that.

oh “al”. did you forget that you shouldn’t say slanderous/libelous things about your ex partner in crime? hm?

[red] I just wanted to let you know that there is a difference between slander and libel. Slander is via oral communication, while libel is via written communication. I’m surprised I have to teach this to someone who has studied law. [/red]

All this is enthralling and all, but if I wanted arguing over grammar and punctuation, I wouldn’t be on a Ministry board. I’d go find some grammar board or somesuch.

Paul, Bill and Chris were interviewed together and then Al was interviewed separately. Gerda thinks that the separate nature of the interviews was not communicated well enough and is concerned that it might make it appear that Paul, Chris and Bill are all still on friendly terms with Al. Simple enough to me. I really don’t see how this turned into a multi-page debate.

All this is enthralling and all, but if I wanted arguing over grammar and punctuation, I wouldn’t be on a Ministry board. I’d go find some grammar board or somesuch

seeing as how most everyone’s grammar here (for the most part) leaves something to be desired, and yet, Gerda’s post are the only posts being corrected… I don’t think it’s about her grammar.

Just a couple of hunches, but the often times cryptic nature of Gerda’s posts might make whoever lunaticgenius is think that it’s the grammar and usage that makes her posts cryptic…

maybe because lunaticgenius has never met a lawyer who doesn’t have command of the english language…

who knows? but it’s obvious (to me anyway) this isn’t about grammar because Gerda makes herself such an easy target
Late,
grmpysmrf

Figured as much. How an argument stemmed from it is beyond me as well…

It’s perfectly clear Al (and Ogre) are not in the same doom as the others.

Typo (?) of the week.

[reply]It’s perfectly clear Al (and Ogre) are not in the same doom as the others.

Typo (?) of the week.[/reply]

My computer’s busted. Not easy to post via Wii.

Also nobody who reads the article could possibly think Al and the others are getting along.