soldiers fling puppy

Kick ass that totally sets a precident!! IT’S OPEN SEASON ON THE HOMELESS!!!
They are strays. Most of them are sick and diseased!!

Different sense of humor? Since when did killing become funny?
Been a real hard Day? Imagine how that puppy feels!

How did you disconnect your parents and girlfriend’s phone from way over there in IRAQ? Is your whole family/associates buffoons? Perhaps they are diseased? Uh Oh you what that means!!??

Nobody is asking you to keep a pet, or even to care for it…If you must take on the burden of “Doing it a favor” do it humanely YOU MILITARY SICKO!! Does your brain really not Function? WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION LOSER?
Late,
grmpysmrf

Well said Jokey Smurf.

All of the western society military act all tough but actually get their ass kicked by small guerilla forces.

See here in the UK recently on the news…a decent sized force got defeated by the Taleban and they blamed the defeat on lack of money??? What a load of shit!! Taleban as far as i know don’t have body armour and all the rest of our shithot gadgets. We just got our arses kicked by a few pissed off locals then came up with some lame ass excuse for us war “fans” back home.

COMPETELY AGREED!!!
I’ve been saying for a while Now and meaning to post it here. that there is NO WINNING in IRAQ!!! you can’t defeat Guerilla warfare. Our esteemed leaders ought to know that better than anybody. The reason the US is independent from ENGLAND is precicesly because of Guerilla Warfare. and yet those in charge blame our defeats on “naysayers” What crap!! It Comletely is true “Those who do Not remebember the past are doomed to repeat it!”. Only this time the US is playing the part of ENGLAND!
Late,
grmpysmrf

The reason the US is independent from ENGLAND

I think you’ll find it was “Britain” not England.

And yes indeed Guerilla Warfare always kicks ass…usually it’s because the “Guerillas” are actually fighting for something worth fighting for…what exactley are our bonehead sons and daughters fighting for over there???

I think you’ll find it was “Britain” not England.

Holy Crap you’re right. I didn’t even realize I wrote England even though I capped it! redcoats and what not…That was a huge faux pas and I’m seriously embarrassed…Alright getting over it.

[quote]And yes indeed Guerilla Warfare always kicks ass…usually it’s because the “Guerillas” are actually fighting for something worth fighting for…what exactley are our bonehead sons and daughters fighting for over there???[/reply]

Well that’s the partial reason I think Guerillas always win…(The south had more heart than the north in the Civil War and were actually fighting for their Livlihoods but still lost) I think Guerillas mainly win out because there are not set rules that they play by. Our military is structured and has to follow the rules of warfare, whereas Guerillas show, up hit and run, (don’t even care who they hit half the time) and that’s pretty much it. and with modern technology the Guerillas don’t even need to be around when they “hit” a unit. Old style G-warfare was a little easier to fight cause you could actually see the people as they were running away from their attack(and Possibly shoot at them). now in Iraq who knows who is on who’s side?? an IED went off and nobody knows who was responsible for it? YOU CAN’T BEAT THAT STRATEGY!! The ROYAL NAVY couldn’t beat it 200+ years ago! We aren’t beating it now.
late,
grmpysmrf

Well that’s the partial reason I think Guerillas always win…(The south had more heart than the north in the Civil War and were actually fighting for their Livlihoods but still lost)

I don’t know about that. The south weren’t “Guerillas”. And they weren’t exactley fighting for their livlihoods, they were fighting for the right to own black people as slaves and make the black people slave their guts out for the white peoples livlihoods so the white people could sit back and do nothing but get drunk and rape their slaves wives and daughters…so as you see they weren’t fighting for a moral cause and got defeated.

Our military is structured and has to follow the rules of warfare, whereas Guerillas show, up hit and run, (don’t even care who they hit half the time) [reply]

The “don’t care who they hit half the time” DEFINATELY apllies to our military overseas. And at least 50% of the time doesn’t follow the structured rules of warfare.

[reply] and with modern technology the Guerillas don’t even need to be around when they “hit” a unit.[reply]

Again this sounds like you’re describing our military…i.e send in a plane and bomb the fuck out of a position we have little or no knowledge of.

[reply] now in Iraq who knows who is on who’s side??[reply]

That’s right…that’s why so many of the allies are being killed by so called “friendly” fire.

[reply]The ROYAL NAVY couldn’t beat it 200+ years ago! We aren’t beating it now.

Correct.

Anyway the goverment doesn’t want these “wars” won, so all’s going to plan.

I don’t know about that. The south weren’t “Guerillas”. And they weren’t exactley fighting for their livlihoods, they were fighting for the right to own black people as slaves and make the black people slave their guts out for the white peoples livlihoods so the white people could sit back and do nothing but get drunk and rape their slaves wives and daughters…so as you see they weren’t fighting for a moral cause and got defeated.

#1 Right The South didn’t use Guerilla Type tactics , But you had said before that Guerillas always have passion for what they are fighting for which is why they win. I just disagree, Passion alone isn’t going to win a war for you and I offered the south up as evidence
#2 Slavery was completely the South’s Livelihood. Livelihood doesn’t need a moral cause. All Livelihood is, is your way of life. The South had created a very easy way of life off of unpaid labor and they weren’t about to give that up. Meaning “If slaves go So does their way of life.” 'Cuase southerners weren’t about to do that back breaking labor themselves or Shudder hire someone to do it.
So, Why Yes, Cruel and barbaric, Owning slaves was completely the Souths livelihood. In short, that’s how they made their money.

Our military is structured and has to follow the rules of warfare, whereas Guerillas show, up hit and run, (don’t even care who they hit half the time)

The “don’t care who they hit half the time” DEFINATELY apllies to our military overseas. And at least 50% of the time doesn’t follow the structured rules of warfare.

Not really. We draw up plans for war and we stick to them (it seems no matter what) Guerillas are kind of like american football they call the play before they attack and if things aren’t going well they call an audible whereas american forces don’t call the play right before the attack begins and they certainly don’t call audibles because the chain of command needs to be followed.

and with modern technology the Guerillas don’t even need to be around when they “hit” a unit.

Again this sounds like you’re describing our military…i.e send in a plane and bomb the fuck out of a position we have little or no knowledge of.

Yeah but those plane strikes are usually based on intelligence that is who knows how old…Id’ say the Guerillas are usually quick about their strikes because again there is no real chain of command to be followed. Also they are living in that region and are familiar with the patterns of everyday life in the region. Our strikes are dictated from washington…From people who don’t really know what’s going on.

[quote]

The ROYAL NAVY couldn’t beat it 200+ years ago! We aren’t beating it now.

Correct.

Anyway the goverment doesn’t want these “wars” won, so all’s going to plan.[/reply]

I’ll second that…No Bid contracts for the upper 1%. Yes, war is good for the economy…as long as you’re on that end of the economy…and so few of us are.
Late,
grmpysmrf