Slash's New CD RULEZ!

I know it’s not most here’s cup of tea, I don’t care, this is seriously my pleasure. I can’t tell you what it is, maybe it’s really a man crush,(as fat tits suggests) maybe he plays shit I dig into on a subconscious level, hell maybe uses subliminals and my mind’s ear can hear it loud and clear. I don’t know, what I do know is that generally whatever this guy belts out on guitar I absolutely adore.

I have quite a bit of respect for him as a guitarist myself.

I’m listening, and it was the same tired complaints that you always have for anything you don’t like. I would imagine you had made your mind up not to like it long before the album idea was even conceived.

Although, I do doff my hat to you if you really did listen to all of it. Can’t fault you for not liking it then, it’s just an opinion…and yours at that. You’re a hard guy to please, musically. and I know how musically diverse we are that it was probably a pretty hard exercise for you to sit through all of it. and if you indeed did listen to all of it, Brownie points to you.

Let’s see. First off it has Ian Astbury on it. I like the Cult. It has Iggy Pop on it. Iggy is a star. It has Lemmy on it. It has Chris Cornell on it. It has Ozzy on it. It has Dave Grohl on it. With this in mind I was quite prepared to enjoy this album on some level, even if I do believe that most of those guys are past their used by date. I was hoping to get some enjoyment out of a reasonable mix of frontmen I either admire or have admired at some point in my youth.

Imagine my surprise then when what I heard sounded for all the world like a slightly edgier, slightly harder version of Matchbox 20 mixed with Creed mixed with sappy, soulless FM radio modern rock.

I didn’t like it all. It was everything I’d hoped it wouldn’t be. But still I pushed on and listened to the whole thing.

Twice!

Oh do tell. I would love to read what GnR you consider decent. what if anything is “pushing the musical limits” on a GnR record? It’s all just great sounding music, but none of it, by the standards that you have shown represent you, would even come close to passing your smell test.

I like enough Guns’n’Roses. Liked their cover of ‘Patience’, ‘Mr Brownstone’ is how I’d always hoped Aerosmith could/would sound like and ‘Civil War’ still manages to send shivers up my spine - even all these years later.

Just because an album doesn’t push musical boundaries and tick all the right avant garde boxes doesn’t mean I won’t listen to it? Is Prince ‘boundary pushing’? Because I listen to Prince all the time. Likewise Madonna.

your post was your normal music snob self. Shocked you posted so much really. it reads like your annoyed having to write it.

Only slightly perturbed thinking this Slash guy is a whole lot better than that album suggests.

perhaps for you it was “upfront and Honest” but it just seemed snide over all. I give Void more credit for not liking it(again not that I care). He just came right out and said I don’t like the hooks, I don’t like the melody, the vocals suck etc etc… that to me seems more upfront and honest than anything you have written.

It was bland, generic corporate rock to a tee. And from memory GnR never made bland, generic corporate rock. Why does he start now? Hell, even the new GnR was much better than that Slash album. The lyrics were generally laughable, it was massively overproduced - completely devoid of soul - and the musical arrangements were at best competent. Nothing made me think “This is working. I’m really feeling this”. I just wasn’t sold. That’s not snide or snobby. Just honest and open feedback.

Are you sold on N’Sync? Take That? No? Why? Aren’t you just being ‘snobby’ if you disregard music like that? Plenty of times I can recall threads being started and ol’ Grmpy chimes in with the obvious ‘Soundgarden sucks!’ or ‘Faith No More sucks’ or ‘this sucks’ or ‘that sucks’!

It works both ways.

It was a foregone conclusion, for me, that you wouldn’t like it and that you would post your dissatisfaction with it on the thread. I think what bothers me about it is that what you included in your post was pretty much exactly what I figured you would post.

I might say the same thing having recommended you something that was, as you’d say, ‘boundary pushing’. Something experimental and atonal. It’s almost a foregone conclusion that you’d dismiss it as sounding like a washing machine or somebody starting up their car. But I’d hope you’d at least listen to it. Which is exactly what I did.

No bullshit, I even contemplated creating a rough outline of the gripes you would have about it and see how they would match up with what you would actually post. Just from what I remember listing in my mind, you pretty much hit all of them.

That’s sounds like you are almost admitting that the album conforms to what I have said about it and you’re just waiting for me to come out and say it. On some subconcious level then, if you have made these ‘points’, do you think the album is flawed?

You must agree with me to some extent if you listened to it and thought ‘Gee, Peligro would rip this to pieces!’.

Here is really what I’m wondering, what exactly makes it predictable and stale to you?

Because the album lacks balls!!! It’s safe and generic and bland and sounds like a million other crap FM radio modern rock bands. I’d always assumed that it’s because of the turgid state of modern rock radio that we form little web community clusters like the prongs forum and discuss ‘our’ music’. Because modern radio is so horrendously shit!! And here’s ol’ Slashy boy conforming to every generic corporate marketing guy’s wet dream of how a modern rock album should sound.

Guns’n’Roses were never about ‘conforming’ and pleasing the masses with ho hum built-for-maximum-airplay crud. Which is what made them so exciting in the first place.

But what’s this new shit?!?!?!

What about Slash’s record is predictable in anyway, all of his riffs are different and catchy and are in no way the same, the way the pedal steel is with country. You get my question?

It just bored me. Plain and simple. The way I’m bored by Linkin Park and Creed and My Chemical Romance etc. It’s soulless and plastic. It’s tweaked and polished to the point where it becomes more of a product than something that will make a difference to your life.

It has nothing to say to me, on any level.

Anyway, I’m happy that you like it and hope you get alot of joy out of it. I’ve recommended you plenty of music in the past and alot of it you’ve dug which is cool.

Guess we’re just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Like you said, as if we didn’t see this coming.

Imagine my surprise then when what I heard sounded for all the world like a slightly edgier, slightly harder version of Matchbox 20 mixed with Creed mixed with sappy, soulless FM radio modern rock.

slightly edgier…? Wow, we couldn’t disagree more. it’s a completely different style of music. Slash’s solos, riffs and chord structure are way more musically appealing than those bands.

and even if I were to concede and say “you’re right” (Which I’m not) at least his “safe” music is still better than those bands you’ve just mentioned.

I like enough Guns’n’Roses. Liked their cover of ‘Patience’, ‘Mr Brownstone’ is how I’d always hoped Aerosmith could/would sound like and ‘Civil War’ still manages to send shivers up my spine - even all these years later.

I’m schocked, what’s more bland than patience? probably my most disliked Guns n roses song. (Next to So Fine on Illusion II) That’s closer to creed than anything on Slash’s new album. I know Browstone is pretty damn good, but what makes it “edgy” is Axl’s lyrics. And I gotta tell ya’ My wife has kinda ruined that song a little bit when she pointed out that the drums sound like the “I want candy” song. Although Slash’s parts are still pretty sweet on those songs. I guess I don’t understand how you can distinguish how some bit of “corporate rock” is better than another when it seems that it’s all the same to you.

got nothing for Civil War. Everybodies parts on that song are superb from start to finish.

Just because an album doesn’t push musical boundaries and tick all the right avant garde boxes doesn’t mean I won’t listen to it? Is Prince ‘boundary pushing’? Because I listen to Prince all the time. Likewise Madonna.

So doesn’t your diatribe against Slash’s new album also hold true for Madonna and prince then? why is their brand of “corporate rock” better? I think Madonna and Prince are probably closer to N*Sync than anything rock oriented. Prince and Madonna are not Rock.

Only slightly perturbed thinking this Slash guy is a whole lot better than that album suggests.

He seems like he and his guitar are their normal brilliant self to me. Granted some of the lyrics aren’t the best but then Slash isn’t noted for his lyrics… not only that I even point out that some of the lyrics aren’t that great especially with “gotten” but it’s more of the way that the guy sings them rather than what’s being sung.

It was bland, generic corporate rock to a tee. And from memory GnR never made bland, generic corporate rock. Why does he start now?

It sounds like Normal GnR to me, minus Axl.

Hell, even the new GnR was much better than that Slash album.

Not even close. while Chinese democracy had quite a few decent songs they were really nice collages at best. many times the solos didn’t match the vibe that was put out by the rhythm or feel of the song.

On the Albums Ballad, “This I love” Axl whines his way through the song. I suppose all of Chinese Democracy is good but not necessarily together. Meaning, for example, the piano in “This I love” is great but doesn’t go with Axl’s voice. The song progressions are all great but don’t go with the guitar work that was laid down for it or the solos are all good but don’t really fit with the songs they are in. I can’t really say that about any Slash album.

The lyrics were generally laughable, it was massively overproduced - completely devoid of soul - and the musical arrangements were at best competent. Nothing made me think “This is working. I’m really feeling this”. I just wasn’t sold. That’s not snide or snobby. Just honest and open feedback.

If that’s your honest assessment I guess I can’t fault you for that, just sad for you. and you usually say this anyway about anything you don’t like…And that is still more description than your original post… I think.

Wish you could hear the guitar chops that I do. The quiet guitar in Gotten with his trills. The scribbled string in Nothing to say. the big airy solos in by the sword…

Are you sold on N’Sync? Take That? No? Why? Aren’t you just being ‘snobby’ if you disregard music like that?

completely different genre that I don’t dig into. Not really the same thing.

Plenty of times I can recall threads being started and ol’ Grmpy chimes in with the obvious ‘Soundgarden sucks!’ or ‘Faith No More sucks’ or ‘this sucks’ or ‘that sucks’!

It works both ways.

I can tell you why something sucks, though, I don’t have some normal pre-filled out complaint form -which it seems you do- that I just post whenever anyone posts on a band/artist

I might say the same thing having recommended you something that was, as you’d say, ‘boundary pushing’. Something experimental and atonal. It’s almost a foregone conclusion that you’d dismiss it as sounding like a washing machine or somebody starting up their car. But I’d hope you’d at least listen to it. Which is exactly what I did.

I listen to the stuff you recommend. and yea alot of it sounds like the artist just walked around with a mini recorder taking recordings of various noises through out the day. I don’t think that makes music. I would no more call it music than I would a CD of Halloween noises.

[reply]No bullshit, I even contemplated creating a rough outline of the gripes you would have about it and see how they would match up with what you would actually post. Just from what I remember listing in my mind, you pretty much hit all of them.

That’s sounds like you are almost admitting that the album conforms to what I have said about it
[/reply]
Not in the least. It’s admitting that you say the SAME THING about EVERYTHING. You said it about Killing Joke, you said it about Ministry, you’ve said about nu revco, LFG from Old revco, you’ve said it about Stayte. I’m pretty sure I remember the same diatribe about the cure… the list goes on an on. That’s not saying the album conforms to what you say, that’s just knowing your generic complaint form.

You must agree with me to some extent if you listened to it and thought ‘Gee, Peligro would rip this to pieces!’.

Yeah, except that I thought that without even applying it to the music I was listening to.

Guns’n’Roses were never about ‘conforming’ and pleasing the masses with ho hum built-for-maximum-airplay crud. Which is what made them so exciting in the first place.

As I said before, I really don’t see a difference in this music than I do older GnR. Add Axl’s voice and it’s a GnR record. Besides, the “boundary pushing” in GnR was Axl’s Lyrics. The music has generally always been solid except for a few duds.

It just bored me. Plain and simple. The way I’m bored by Linkin Park and Creed and My Chemical Romance etc. It’s soulless and plastic.

and I can’t fault you for that. to me that’s a respectable complaint. One I don’t agree with, but that seems honest to me rather than what you originally posted. Still would expect you to be bored by it just given your “musical” tastes but at least what you wrote just now seems genuine.

You’ll like this analogy:

I liken your musical taste to somebody stuck watching porn.

when you first start normal missionary porn is okay. but pretty soon it becomes bland and you up the ante with anal porn…

pretty soon that becomes bland and now your into S&M and pretty soon that becomes tame and you’re off to find something else…

Well you can’t appreciate the Missionary anymore because you are so far off into a different direction, yuo’re into music that most wouldn’t consider music. the way people trapped in porn are into sex acts that most wouldn’t consider sex…
Ya’ dig?

It’s tweaked and polished to the point where it becomes more of a product than something that will make a difference to your life.

You’re looking for a ghandi-esque record? no, of course it’s not going to change your life. it’s just sounds good!

It has nothing to say to me, on any level.

and I’m sorry for you for that. IT must be musically lonely where you are at.

Anyway, I’m happy that you like it and hope you get alot of joy out of it. I’ve recommended you plenty of music in the past and alot of it you’ve dug which is cool.

you know kit’s always fun with us![cool]

Guess we’re just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Like you said, as if we didn’t see this coming.
[;)]
Late,
grmpysmrf

I gave most of the album a listen on Slash’s site. I love the way it sounds. I was expecting something with layers and layers of guitars and heavily treated drums with big bursts of gated reverb, etc. But I do dig the sparseness of it.

On the other hand, the only presentation I liked was Iggy’s song. The rest of it seems rather pedestrian. I realize it’s not meant to be ground breaking and Slash was swallowed up in the world of pentatonic riffs long ago, but I guess I expected him to cut loose with a few different styles a bit more. It’s good old fashioned riff rock.

I’d blast it if I was driving through the desert with the top down, but since I don’t get to do that much it’s really not my cup o tea.

So doesn’t your diatribe against Slash’s new album also hold true for Madonna and prince then? why is their brand of “corporate rock” better? I think Madonna and Prince are probably closer to N*Sync than anything rock oriented. Prince and Madonna are not Rock.

N’Sync etc are entities put together by large corporations to fill a niche market. Their music is written by ‘professional writers’ who are adept at pleasing the fantasies of young girls and boys. It is carefully constructed and is all the more soulless for it. I would liken that kind of music to a particularly sugary brand of breakfast cereal.

When Prince and Madonna started out they were anything but ‘corporate’. They were street smart and savvy and their music had something to say to everybody (almost). Musically, the melodies were infectious and the grooves had an ‘edge’ that had been sadly lacking in pop music for a long time. Pop music in the 70s and early 80s was squeaky clean and banal. Prince and Madonna made pop music exciting again.

Admittedly I haven’t followed their recent releases but I would say that, back in the day, the only thing that N’Sync would have had in common with Madonna and Prince was that they all fell loosely under the term ‘pop’ music.

If that’s your honest assessment I guess I can’t fault you for that, just sad for you.

Sad for me? Oh come on. Who’s being pretentious now?

I can tell you why something sucks, though, I don’t have some normal pre-filled out complaint form -which it seems you do- that I just post whenever anyone posts on a band/artist

No you don’t. In fact, your put downs generally add up to little more than: so and so sucks, so ner ner ner…!

There are plenty of non corporate bands whose albums I would criticise. I don’t have a pre filled agenda when critiquing something. I think what I say stands out more to you because it irks you to have to read negative posts on the music you like.

I listen to the stuff you recommend. and yea alot of it sounds like the artist just walked around with a mini recorder taking recordings of various noises through out the day. I don’t think that makes music. I would no more call it music than I would a CD of Halloween noises.

Well…that is an honest reply. I can’t fault that either. If you don’t like something I like, I’m not going to snigger or call you ‘stupid’.

I don’t agree. But obviously we identify with different aspects of music when we listen to it. You like music you can sing along to, tap yr toe to and I like music for its atmosphere, texture and ambience. It doesn’t necessarily have to have words or structure or an identifiable melody.

Not in the least. It’s admitting that you say the SAME THING about EVERYTHING. You said it about Killing Joke, you said it about Ministry, you’ve said about nu revco, LFG from Old revco, you’ve said it about Stayte. I’m pretty sure I remember the same diatribe about the cure… the list goes on an on. That’s not saying the album conforms to what you say, that’s just knowing your generic complaint form.

What have I said about Killing Joke and Ministry? Other than their new material does little if anything to inspire me. Personally I think both those bands ran out of ideas long ago. I’ve never liked Revco. Ever. I can’t stand Stayte. How is that ‘generic’? The response is generic because I don’t like certain things? I don’t say the same things about every band. I often use familiar terms when describing something - yes. Perhaps that’s what you’re referring to, I’m not sure.

You’ll like this analogy:

I liken your musical taste to somebody stuck watching porn.

when you first start normal missionary porn is okay. but pretty soon it becomes bland and you up the ante with anal porn…

pretty soon that becomes bland and now your into S&M and pretty soon that becomes tame and you’re off to find something else…

Well you can’t appreciate the Missionary anymore because you are so far off into a different direction, yuo’re into music that most wouldn’t consider music. the way people trapped in porn are into sex acts that most wouldn’t consider sex…

I do like that analogy. Any particular porn you could recommend?

You’re looking for a ghandi-esque record? no, of course it’s not going to change your life. it’s just sounds good!

I hear what you are saying there. I do.

and I’m sorry for you for that. IT must be musically lonely where you are at.

Because I can’t appreciate a Slash record?!?!?!? Because I’m not too crash hot on guitar based modern radio rock therefore I’m in a lonely place? Oh please.

I’ll stick with what I know thank you very much.

you know it’s always fun with us![cool]

I just wish someone else would join in. It’s always more fun with three.

On the other hand, the only presentation I liked was Iggy’s song. The rest of it seems rather pedestrian. I realize it’s not meant to be ground breaking and Slash was swallowed up in the world of pentatonic riffs long ago,

happy you got at least one track out of it. as far as the pentatonic comment goes… i don’t really know the world of scales but i find it odd that your the third person to mention this in less than a month (not bitching just commenting on your comment)
Late,
grmpysmrf

I think Peligro really did give this a chance and you are going overboard grmpy.

Yes his usual assessment of it as being “corporate” “stale” and “mainstream” was prevalent, but I agree in this case (even if, again, his perception of “mainstream” is more or less rooted in early 00’s)

Because instead of projecting his desires on Slash (that this would be some kind of avant garde, noise-filled, experimental outing where Slash detuned his strings and put objects inside them–a la John Cage “prepared piano”–and/or did crazy guitar work in odd time signatures), he basically went looking for what Slash does best…something ballsy, sleezy and dirty rock 'n roll.

So I think he deserves some credit for giving it a shot and not approaching it from the typical “Peligro” bias.

Now if he would do that for ‘Antichrist Superstar’ (managed to get over the image he dislikes so much and give it a shot) and still said it was bland/uninspired THEN you’d maybe have a point…

And I only use Manson here because I think that is a band Peligro genuinely WOULD like if he gave them a chance (in their heyday that is) but I feel he won’t for the same reasons you accuse him of having a bias against this album.

When Prince and Madonna started out they were anything but ‘corporate’. They were street smart and savvy and their music had something to say to everybody (almost). Musically, the melodies were infectious and the grooves had an ‘edge’ that had been sadly lacking in pop music for a long time. Pop music in the 70s and early 80s was squeaky clean and banal. Prince and Madonna made pop music exciting again.

Well I find this hard to believe especially with early songs like rasberry beret, the most beautiful girl, diamonds and pearls or borderline, true blue, papa don’t preach, who’s that girl etc etc.

that sounds like the same brand of sugar cereal. Granted I like that sugary cereal from Prince and Madonna but it stands as the same to me as N*sync. the reason I don’t like the newer bands is more because I don’t like their voices and their hooks aren’t very catchy, not enough guitar obviously and as you correctly point out their lyrics are usually insipid.

Prince and Madonna are great vocalists so they could take those crappy lyrics and make them sound good. but as far as the music goes their voices bring up the music. imo. It’s the same music, instrument wise.

I think Micheal Jackson’s sound was edgier than theirs ever was. Hell, I’ll stand by statement from Thriller all the way up to the dangerous album and Dangerous sucked balls, more straight R&B than anything else on that record.

Sad for me? Oh come on. Who’s being pretentious now?

I didn’t mean that as dickheadish as I guess it reads. I just meant it would seem a lot of music that comes out you would be bored with because it is generic or more specific as as you mention later in your post, not atmospheric.

[reply]I listen to the stuff you recommend. and yea alot of it sounds like the artist just walked around with a mini recorder taking recordings of various noises through out the day. I don’t think that makes music. I would no more call it music than I would a CD of Halloween noises.

Well…that is an honest reply. I can’t fault that either. If you don’t like something I like, I’m not going to snigger or call you ‘stupid’.
[/reply]
I didn’t call you stupid, I was just irritated, that it seemed like it was your normal complaints and you didn’t really put any thought into why you didn’t like it.

I don’t agree. But obviously we identify with different aspects of music when we listen to it. You like music you can sing along to, tap yr toe to and I like music for its atmosphere, texture and ambience. It doesn’t necessarily have to have words or structure or an identifiable melody.

this is the pole smoking part of the thread:
and to your credit (no disrespect or pretentiousness meant) you’ve opened up a little world of that to me, to which I say thank you. It’s not my every day music but i can certainly appreciate the atmosphere that some create. most lately lotus eaters. although that music is mostly night time music, where the toe tapping hooks and sing along music is anytime music.

[reply]You’ll like this analogy:

I liken your musical taste to somebody stuck watching porn.

when you first start normal missionary porn is okay. but pretty soon it becomes bland and you up the ante with anal porn…

pretty soon that becomes bland and now your into S&M and pretty soon that becomes tame and you’re off to find something else…

Well you can’t appreciate the Missionary anymore because you are so far off into a different direction, you’re into music that most wouldn’t consider music. the way people trapped in porn are into sex acts that most wouldn’t consider sex…

I do like that analogy. Any particular porn you could recommend?
[/reply]
Yeah… I got nothing… I find youporn.com generally has whatever I need… make sure you have updated Virus Blockers though cause some of those videos can give your comp an std

[reply]
You’re looking for a ghandi-esque record? no, of course it’s not going to change your life. it’s just sounds good!

I hear what you are saying there. I do.
[/reply]
well, glad you still understand ear candy… and I understand too, my mother in law loves peeps I can’t stand them. some candy isn’t for everyone!

[reply]and I’m sorry for you for that. IT must be musically lonely where you are at.

Because I can’t appreciate a Slash record?!?!?!? Because I’m not too crash hot on guitar based modern radio rock therefore I’m in a lonely place? Oh please.
[/reply]
No, because of my porn analogy. You are right, there are a shit ton of bands that come out everyday that have nothing you are looking for, as far as ambiance and textures. when you have simpler pleasures it’s easier to be pleased. I’m sure it’s harder to market to your ear, so many won’t even attempt it.

[reply]you know it’s always fun with us![cool]

I just wish someone else would join in. It’s always more fun with three.
[/reply]
word! i think they’re all scared of us … or find us boorish…
Late,
grmpysmrf

void:
He basically went looking for what Slash does best…something ballsy, sleezy and dirty rock 'n roll.

Yea I still hear all of that. it may have a gloss over it but that’s just so it stands up against the elements better! I suppose if Mike Clink (He produced AFD) was producing it you guys would be able to hear it better.

More analogies!:
AFD was a 69 fastback mustang all painted up in black primer and with a sickly sweet 4 barrel carb, 357 Windsor engine.

Slash’s solo projects (This one included) is that same car but he’s just added a coat of clear coat to the primer… [cool] too bad I’m not teaching an analogy unit anytime soon, I’ve got a knack for this shit!

upon further discussion with Peligro I think he did give it a chance as well. we just approach music differently and now that we have sniffed out our angles… again. we are on the same different pages again!

BTW. I don’t think Peligro would Dig any Manson except maybe, maybe Portrait of An American Family. That album is “dirty” and raw and before the whole makeup thing and not really gimmicky. There’s certainly a broken down trailer park vibe to it so it has its atmosphere… You just feel like you gotta take a shower after listening to it.

but the Marilyn list for him would certainly end with that one album. and I’m sure he’d give it a Fair to Fair+ rating.

You know you really should check that album out, Peligro, just for shits and giggles. I’d be interested in knowing If I’d peg your thoughts right, for that album
Late,
grmpysmrf

I actually bought ‘Anti Christ Superstar’ when it came out. So yeah…I did give it a chance. Ditto ‘Downward Spiral’.

I just didn’t like them. Not prepared to offer up a 10 page thesis as to why I didn’t at this point as I can’t be arsed. Some of the music was good.

I guess I just don’t like commercial sounding FM radio rock. Most of the shit I listen doesn’t get much airplay - which I guess says a lot for my tastes. Let’s just say I get bored of it very easily. Or better yet, I have a low tolerance threshold to that stuff.

Not sure why I bothered with Slash. I supposed at least I can say I tried.

Am I biased? Not really more than most people here, I’m just more vocal about it.

And I hate that John Cage prepared piano art wank.

Start another thread about rock music Grmpy. I’ve really missed these encounters.

I actually love John Cage’s prepared piano stuff. I love turning a piano into a percussion instrument, it makes a huge clonky drum kit out of our familiar ivory keys. If listened to outside of the whole “this is important” skew, I also find the music a lot of fun. Cage seems to have a pretty good sense of humor though I think that’s often missed.

Now, I have a hankering for that stuff and those CDs are back in MN with my wife. Another among the many reasons to be impatient for her to move out!

I actually bought ‘Anti Christ Superstar’ when it came out.

“Portrait…” is a completely different beast. Honestly, give it a shot if you get bored one day. Seriously, if you didn’t know the name Marilyn Manson and you listened to those two albums back to back you’d think they were a different band. Hell, with as often as the guy formerly known as Brian Warner, fires band members, one could probably argue it is a different band.
Late,
grmpysmrf

I am distraught this morning to find the departure of MIA from prongs. [:(]

Well Grumpy, I perused the album and I gotta say I was not impressed. This is coming from someone who very much likes the early GnR and thinks Slash is a talented instrumentalist. This album however, to me anyway, just seems to lack any kind of “edge” or “bite” or whatever you want to call it… it lacks balls!

I think this lies mainly in the production, in that production wise it does sound very typical to the way nearly all mainstream rock records are made these days, with too much loudness and compression and overall just way to polished sounding. Crank “Welcome to the Jungle” on a decent stereo system and then play this new Slash record and I’m sure you’ll here the difference.

And production aesthetics aside, I don’t really think the songs are strong enough to carry an album. Hate to say it, but I’d give the album a D+. Glad you enjoy it Grumpy, sorry I cannot share your enthusiasm.

Listening now.
Don’t care for the big, overblown, pre-grunge Hollywood rock sound.
It’s hella better than Chinese Democracy, though.

I am distraught this morning to find the departure of MIA from prongs. [:(]

Yes, but she has been replaced by Little Lulu getting butt-sexed by Tubbo, which is also entertaining.

Huge fan of the Cult so i looked forward to hear the first track most of all.

But it fails in my opinion because the production is extremely FLAT and too “polished”.
Rock n´ roll songs-pop production- not enough guitar noise and the drums sound programmed.

[reply]I am distraught this morning to find the departure of MIA from prongs. [:(]

Yes, but she has been replaced by Little Lulu getting butt-sexed by Tubbo, which is also entertaining.[/reply]

I’d prefer if it was MIA getting butt sexed

This album however, to me anyway, just seems to lack any kind of “edge” or “bite” or whatever you want to call it… it lacks balls!

I think this lies mainly in the production, in that production wise it does sound very typical to the way nearly all mainstream rock records are made these days, with too much loudness and compression and overall just way to polished sounding. Crank “Welcome to the Jungle” on a decent stereo system and then play this new Slash record and I’m sure you’ll here the difference.

And production aesthetics aside, I don’t really think the songs are strong enough to carry an album. Hate to say it, but I’d give the album a D+. Glad you enjoy it Grumpy, sorry I cannot share your enthusiasm.

I gotta jump aboard here and say I agree unanimously. Like Peligro, I went looking for some of that Slash ‘old Gold’ and found it to be severely lacking. Barely a musical hook or memorable lyric in sight. The production is sugar coated pop nonsense - a stain on whoever produced this slop. As was mentioned before, it seemd like a batch of Americann Idol standard sing alongs. Boring and pedestrian and utterly un-rock’n’roll. The track with the chick singing (I have heard the name Fergie before but can’t quite place her) was particularly dire.

Pretty sad that he has to resort to this kind of dreck in order to get his career up and running again.

What happened to the Slash I remember from my youth?
The Slash I remember would never have ok’d this.

I’d give it maybe a 2 out of 10.

My missus was a G’n"R freak back in the day - even has the Appetite For Destruction cross tattooed on her lower back.

She bought this new Slash thingy last week - returned it three days later…utterly appalled at how “pathetic and commercial” it sounded.

I’ve never been a fan so I can’t comment on it. Didn’t bother listening to it.

too bad, she’s probably more of an axl fan, I bet.
I found out that all of the respective vocalists wrote their own lyrics so blame the “crappy” lyrics on the singers. also I imagine here is the "dirty crunch you are looking for?
http://slash.ultimate-guitar.com/news/first_piece_of_footage_from_slashs_first_show_82464.html
Late,
grmpysmrf