I hear that “cigarettes are harder to quit than heroin” line a lot, but I think there’s more in play than just the chemical dependancy or psychosomatic aspects to it.
I really think it’s more of a perception thing and an issue of prioritizing. I mean, count up the tally . . . .
Heroin addiction . . . you might just quickly turn into a shriveled up zombie, puke your guts out, steal from everyone you know, lose your job, your family, everything, and it’ll spiral out of control and cost you $200 a day and lead you to stealing DVD’s from Wal-Mart and/or selling BJ’s under a freeway overpass. Not to mention the AIDS from dirty needles, unpredictable street drugs, disease, death, etc. . . .
Smoking . . . you smell a little worse than usual, maybe have some sinus trouble (over time), maybe develop some cancer or something (over time). You get factory produced cigarettes and maybe your “heavy addiction” costs $10-$15 a day (assuming a few packs a day). Sure, it’s not “good” for you, but it doesn’t completely destroy the life your living and wreck the lives of everyone you know.
Everyone kind of knows the above and there’s a bit more “incentive” and urgency to actually quit and stay off Heroin. And if smoking cigarettes helps someone cope or fill that need for “something” . . . it’s certainly the lesser of two evils.
I’ve never seen someone call an “intervention” for a smoker and read letters about how it’s tearing everyone apart.
This addiction narrative needs some perspective
From an outsider whose point-of-view is influenced by Naked Lunch, I guess it’s a salacious analogy without any bearing in reality.
But the fact is opiates are not pernicious to human health in and of themselves. Only the criminalization, and the policies the DEA’s Drug Crime narco-sate has perpetuated, make them “dangerous.”
Good ol’ tobacco use, however, just leads to lung, esophageal and mouth cancer, emphysema and early death with prolonged suffering.
God, what a choice…