"Is O.J. Innocent?: The Missing Evidence"

Discussion
1

Anyone else watching this (on ID Investigation Discovery) series? I’m 2 episodes in (gonna watch episodes 3 and 4 tonight). I usually dismiss these conspiracy type shows as a bunch of wank, but I think it’s a pretty interesting case presented.

The main idea they are putting forward is that JASON SIMPSON (OJ’s son) was either the perpetrator or co-perpetrator.

I think it’s pretty interesting, and holds water primarily because of how much the LAPD and prosecution left this case.

I certainly don’t think OJ is “innocent” (the show title is obvious bait) but I do think an interesting argument is put forward regarding Jason’s possible involvement.

Anyway . . . . just curious if anyone else is watching and has any strong thoughts going in.

2

Between the mini-series and the 8 hour documentary (both quite good), I think I’m OJ’d out right now.

3

^HAHA!!! I thought I was too, Acid. But . . . . here I am again. I am usually the first to dismiss this type of garbage . . . . and a lot of it is really moronic circumstantial fluff (“well, yes, I was a classmate of Jason and he definitely seemed troubled” . . . “looking at his handwriting it seems to be a man who is guarded and does not want you to get too close” . . . that type of psychobabble).

But the hard evidence forensics stuff is actually pretty cool and does kind of make for some chin scratching.